Fahrenheit Essay

But radiation Bradburys Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451 staunchly agate lines these another(prenominal) writings rather than presenting few omniscient tale admonishing its audience of the dangers of judicature hierarchy, Bradbury uses satire to criticize primarily rising trends in beau monde, providing an account that deems them equally as harrowing and dangerous as some authoritarian disposal, although he does include a limited number of strands involving an anti-government theme. This unique conniption of Fahrenheit 451 has earned the attention of critics and supporters alike. impertinent other novels produced during this time consummation, Bradbury protested a confederation growing increasingly centered round materialistic comforts and desires and less more or less the pursuit of intellect. Bradbury did not simply get his concerns ab bug out the degradation of intellect stock-still he encrypted his message in the layers of a complex tale. Written upon every summon of t he novel is a fragment of knowledge that plays a larger federal agency than superficially unders likewised.Themes involving the value of imagination, the authority of peers, freedom of speech, and the fence between individualism and conformity cut once the novel is more than on the face of it examined. In a time period during which everyone felt that Big Brother existed except to suppress the freedoms of humanity, it became indulgent to forget that commonwealth possess that same power it became easy to forget that when a society loses the tycoon to think independently, exploitation is inevitable. Rather than qualification thoughts and remnants, you atomic number 18 simply told what to think.The send wordmen of Fahrenheit 451 metaphorically represent the closest thing to government control in the entire book. Bradbury uses firemen for this peculiar(a) metaphor because as firemen, they ar judge to protect and accommodate the needs of peck in danger they be literally the lifesavers of society. Yet in Fahrenheit 451, they heap fire to what is good, knowledge and people alike. On the front porch where she had come to weigh them gently with her eyes, her quietness a condemnation, the char stood motionless. Beatty flicked the confuse to spark the kerosene. (Fahrenheit 451) The firemen flameed her.This intense contrast between what is expected of firemen in the truly world and how the firemen act in Bradburys fabricated world emphasizes the importance of their role in the book. The television frameers still install televisions, and people still drive too fast, still the firemen no longer egest fires, they ignite them, and that is something notable. Equally as notable, the firemen do not set the fires because they are coerce to do so they set fires because they entrust it is right. They are the en eventment of censorship.They are the hands of the government. They are the embodiment of evil. Yet the firemen are willing. As spectators to the a trocious society that Bradbury depicts, we cannot help but cringe as the old woman is sunburned to death, or as the urban center is finally destroyed. We cannot understand why the firemen are so eager to commit such(prenominal) heinous crimes until we understand what Bradburys futurist society really depicts. It depicts a society composed of puppets that cannot think but barely comprehend. The firemen believe it is right to destroy books because that is what Beatty, the fire chief, tells them.They do not ask why, they do not object, they monotonously carry out the task at hand. Well, its a job just like each other. Good work with lots of variety. Monday, we burn Miller Tuesday, Tolstoy Wednesday, Walt Whitman Friday, Faulkner and Saturday and Sunday, Schopenhauer and Sartre. We burn them to ashes and then burn the ashes. Thats our official motto. Guy Montag, the principal(prenominal) character, only confirms the notion that the firemen believe it is their craft to burn books, when he provides the reader with a cheery description of his occupation.Also in this riveting effigy of his career, Bradbury has included mockery by naming each pathway after revered authors, adding a brain of pathetic humor to Montags situation, dapple reinforcing a theme of intellectual degradation. Bradburys point in having the firemen burn books on their own accord and not on anothers behalf is to emphasize the conclusion that this is a book written well-nigh society and its people, not the government that runs it. This is peculiarly important because this part of the book is oftentimes misinterpreted.Until the book is examined on a deeper level, Fahrenheit 451 appears to be a falsehood or so government censorship, and how the government can force people to stop reading by slowly outlawing certain books until no books are allowed at all. Bradbury explicitly stated in a LA Weekly word of honor interview, Fahrenheit 451 is not a story about government censorship.